Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Realignment 2013-2015

  1. #1
    Inactive Member Sportsman*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    March 1st, 2003
    Posts
    269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Realignment 2013-2015

    Looks like very minimal changes to Group A in the proposal. Teams can always petition to change though.

    http://www.vhsl.org/files/rr-2013-14...itial-plan.pdf

  2. #2
    Inactive Member Ironlung's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 17th, 2002
    Posts
    10,218
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    I can't believe how much Clintwood's enrollment has dropped just since I graduated in 95. Now down to 287, 2 more than Burton. With those numbers DCHS would have an enrollment of 663 (probably closer to 600 in actuality).
    "There he goes, one of Gods own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die"

  3. #3
    Inactive Member
    Realignment 2013-2015


    stainless's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 24th, 2009
    Location
    On the mtn.
    Posts
    279
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    Noticed Riverheads enrollment went down a lot. How is that?
    Central Warriors The start of a new ERA!!!!

  4. #4
    Inactive Member UnIoNfAn's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 29th, 2011
    Posts
    301
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    the decline in student body is pitiful everywhere. Union has as many students as powell valley used to average in the 90's. Clintwood is way down from then too. It seems that more and more people are leaving and also not having as many children. I grew up with families that had 3 to 5 kids and now a days most families are having 1 to 2 kids tops. I know its put a hurting on student body numbers and athelets as well

  5. #5
    Inactive Member VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2005
    Posts
    861
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    although quit a few are VERY questionable, the VHSL has released the Sept. 30 ADM's from the state Dept. of Ed., in size order.
    "Highlights"...
    Marion missed being A eligible by 3 kids, Richlands missed by 20.
    Cave Spring IS A eligible by 13 kids.
    Lee is now 13 kids too big for A
    Castlewood is down, despite the addition of the St. Paul kids

    http://www.vhsl.org/files/rr-Sept30-...al-numbers.pdf

  6. #6
    Inactive Member UnIoNfAn's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 29th, 2011
    Posts
    301
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    Here is my question. Lee dropped to A due to acedemic reasons instead of student body so are they going to be able to stay A or do they have to move back to AA with the new realignments?

  7. #7
    Inactive Member collegetrumpet2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 24th, 2009
    Posts
    852
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    I remember several years ago there were concerns that D2 Grayson Co was too large to be even in A and now they''re smaller than Union by about 90 kids.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member red66's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 24th, 2009
    Posts
    433
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    Quote Originally Posted by UnIoNfAn View Post
    Here is my question. Lee dropped to A due to acedemic reasons instead of student body so are they going to be able to stay A or do they have to move back to AA with the new realignments?
    It was my understanding that Lee dropped to A due to the amount of travel that was required to get to their district opponents. I guess that one could assume that with the amount of travel that students (and teacher's that were coaches) had to miss a lot of class for athletics which hurt their academics. Regardless I don't see them having to go back to AA. Lee's enrollment is dropping yearly just like everyone else.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2005
    Posts
    861
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    VHSL says the DoE gave them incorrect numbers... so forget about the realignment stuff for a while

  10. #10
    Inactive Member sambobird9's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 5th, 2010
    Posts
    5
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Realignment 2013-2015

    The Richlands numbers kinda surprise me I was in the high school on the first day of this year and it seemed like kids were every where. I know that the football program has been good over the past several year but how are they in other sports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •